RFC Errata
Found 5 records.
Status: Verified (4)
RFC 4237, "Voice Messaging Directory Service", October 2005
Source of RFC: vpim (app)
Errata ID: 1070
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: RFC Editor
Date Reported: 2005-11-02
Section 4.2 says:
vPIMRfc822Mailbox A IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.2.1 vPIMTelephoneNumber A IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.2.2
It should say:
vPIMTelephoneNumber A 1.3.6.1.1.11.2.1 vPIMRfc822Mailbox A 1.3.6.1.1.11.2.2
Errata ID: 156
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2005-11-30
Section 4.1 says:
IANA has registered an LDAP Object Identifier for use in this technical specification, according to the following template:
It should say:
IANA has registered an LDAP Object Identifier for use in this technical specification, according to the following template. This Object Identifier, 1.3.6.1.1.11, is referred to as the "IANA-ASSIGNED-OID" in the body of this memo.
Errata ID: 157
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2005-11-30
Verifier Name: Alexey Melnikov
Date Verified: 2009-07-18
Section 2 says:
(IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.1 NAME 'vPIMUser' SUP 'top' ... )
It should say:
(IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.1.1 NAME 'vPIMUser' SUP 'top' ... )
Notes:
Note: IANA assigned OID 1.3.6.1.1.11 to IANA-ASSIGNED-OID. See <http://www.iana.org/assignments/ldap-parameters>.
Errata ID: 1071
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2005-11-30
Section 2.5 says:
Because ADPCM is a required format, the audio32kadpcm value must be listed if this attribute is present.
It should say:
Because ADPCM is a required format, the audio/32kadpcm value must be listed if this attribute is present.
Status: Rejected (1)
RFC 4237, "Voice Messaging Directory Service", October 2005
Source of RFC: vpim (app)
Errata ID: 810
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2005-11-30
Rejected by: Alexey Melnikov
Date Rejected: 2009-07-18
I suspect that the OID value given in Section 2 is not correct. It does not match the one listed in section 4.2, on page 10, 4th text line. Therefore I propose the following erratum: RFC 4237, at the beginning of Section 2, on page 3, says: (IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.1 NAME 'vPIMUser' SUP 'top' ... ) it should say: vv (IANA-ASSIGNED-OID.1.1 NAME 'vPIMUser' SUP 'top' ... )
It should say:
[see above]
Notes:
from pending
--VERIFIER NOTES--
Duplicate of the erratum # 157.