RFC Errata
Found 3 records.
Status: Verified (3)
RFC 6767, "Ethernet-Based xDSL Multi-Pair Bonding (G.Bond/Ethernet) MIB", February 2013
Source of RFC: adslmib (ops)
Errata ID: 3589
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Edward Beili
Date Reported: 2013-04-15
Verifier Name: Benoit Claise
Date Verified: 2013-04-16
Section 8 says:
IANA has assigned 264 as the object identifier for the g9982MIB MODULE-IDENTITY in the MIB-2 transmission sub-tree <http://www.iana.org/>.
It should say:
IANA has assigned 209 as the object identifier for the g9982MIB MODULE-IDENTITY in the MIB-2 tree <http://www.iana.org/>.
Notes:
The following changes must be made by IANA in http://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xml :
1. The entry for the value of 209 under mib-2 shall be changed to:
209 g9982MIB G9982-MIB [RFC6767]
2. The entry for the value of 264 under transmission sub-tree shall be changed to:
264 Reserved Reserved
Errata ID: 3590
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Edward Beili
Date Reported: 2013-04-15
Verifier Name: Benoit Claise
Date Verified: 2013-04-16
Section 6 says:
::= { mib-2 264 }
It should say:
::= { mib-2 209 }
Notes:
The following changes must be made by IANA in http://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xml :
1. The entry for the value of 209 under mib-2 shall be changed to:
209 g9982MIB G9982-MIB [RFC6767]
2. The entry for the value of 264 under transmission sub-tree shall be changed to:
264 Reserved Reserved
Errata ID: 4417
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Yixi Lu
Date Reported: 2015-07-17
Verifier Name: Benoit Claise
Date Verified: 2015-07-17
Section 6 says:
g9982BasicGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { g9982PortCapTcTypesSupported, g9982PortCapBacpSupported, g9982PortConfTcAdminType, g9982PortStatTcOperType, g9982PortStatRxErrors, g9982PortStatRxSmallFragments, g9982PortStatRxLargeFragments, g9982PortStatRxBadFragments, g9982PortStatRxLostFragments, g9982PortStatRxLostStarts, g9982PortStatRxLostEnds, g9982PortStatRxOverflows, | g9982BceStatTcInCodingErrors, | g9982BceStatTcInCrcErrors } STATUS current
It should say:
g9982BasicGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { g9982PortCapTcTypesSupported, g9982PortCapBacpSupported, g9982PortConfTcAdminType, g9982PortStatTcOperType, g9982PortStatRxErrors, g9982PortStatRxSmallFragments, g9982PortStatRxLargeFragments, g9982PortStatRxBadFragments, g9982PortStatRxLostFragments, g9982PortStatRxLostStarts, g9982PortStatRxLostEnds, g9982PortStatRxOverflows } STATUS current
Notes:
"g9982BceStatTcInCodingErrors,g9982BceStatTcInCrcErrors" should not appear in g9982BasicGroup when they already exist in g9982BceGroup.