RFC Errata
RFC 6020, "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", October 2010
Source of RFC: netmod (ops)See Also: RFC 6020 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 3832
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Chris LaBauve
Date Reported: 2013-12-12
Verifier Name: Benoit Claise
Date Verified: 2013-12-13
Section 7.4.1 says:
+------------------+---------+-------------+ | substatement | section | cardinality | +------------------+---------+-------------+ | bit | 9.7.4 | 0..n | | enum | 9.6.4 | 0..n | | length | 9.4.4 | 0..1 | | path | 9.9.2 | 0..1 | | pattern | 9.4.6 | 0..n | | range | 9.2.4 | 0..1 | | require-instance | 9.13.2 | 0..1 | | type | 7.4 | 0..n | +------------------+---------+-------------+
It should say:
+------------------+---------+-------------+ | substatement | section | cardinality | +------------------+---------+-------------+ | base | 9.10.2 | 0..1 | | bit | 9.7.4 | 0..n | | enum | 9.6.4 | 0..n | | fraction-digits | 9.3.4 | 0..1 | | length | 9.4.4 | 0..1 | | path | 9.9.2 | 0..1 | | pattern | 9.4.6 | 0..n | | range | 9.2.4 | 0..1 | | require-instance | 9.13.2 | 0..1 | | type | 7.4 | 0..n | +------------------+---------+-------------+
Notes:
9.3.4. states 'The "fraction-digits" statement, which is a substatement to the "type" statement' but 7.4.1 does not list "fraction-digits" as one of the substatements of "type".
9.10.2. states 'The "base" statement, which is a substatement to the "type" statement' but 7.4.1 does not list "base" as one of the substatements of "type".