RFC Errata
RFC 8360, "Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validation Reconsidered", April 2018
Source of RFC: sidr (rtg)See Also: RFC 8360 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 5638
Status: Verified
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alberto Leiva Popper
Date Reported: 2019-02-13
Verifier Name: Warren Kumari (Ops AD)
Date Verified: 2019-02-13
Section 4.2.4.4 says:
7. Compute the VRS-IP and VRS-AS set values as indicated below: * If the IP Address Delegation extension is present in certificate x and x=1, set the VRS-IP to the resources found in this extension. * If the IP Address Delegation extension (...) * If the IP Address Delegation extension (...) * If the IP Address Delegation extension is present in certificate x and x=1, set the VRS-IP to the resources found in this extension. * If the AS Identifier Delegation extension (...) * If the AS Identifier Delegation extension (...)
It should say:
7. Compute the VRS-IP and VRS-AS set values as indicated below: * If the IP Address Delegation extension is present in certificate x and x=1, set the VRS-IP to the resources found in this extension. * If the IP Address Delegation extension (...) * If the IP Address Delegation extension (...) * If the AS Identifier Delegation extension is present in certificate x and x=1, set the VRS-AS to the resources found in this extension. * If the AS Identifier Delegation extension (...) * If the AS Identifier Delegation extension (...)
Notes:
There seems to be a copy-paste error.
There are two bullet points explaining the initialization of VRS-IP, and none explaining the initialization of VRS-AS.
All the evidence suggests that the two extensions (IP Address Delegation and AS Identifier Delegation) are meant to be handled similarly, so I believe that the last three bullet points are supposed to perfectly mirror the first three.