RFC Errata
RFC 8402, "Segment Routing Architecture", July 2018
Note: This RFC has been updated by RFC 9256
Source of RFC: spring (rtg)See Also: RFC 8402 w/ inline errata
Errata ID: 7671
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: Alvaro Retana
Date Reported: 2023-10-09
Verifier Name: James N Guichard
Date Verified: 2023-10-09
Section 4.1 says:
A likely use case for the BGP-Prefix segment is an IGP-free hyper- scale spine-leaf topology where connectivity is learned solely via BGP [RFC7938]
It should say:
A likely use case for the BGP-Prefix segment is an IGP-free hyper- scale spine-leaf topology where connectivity is learned solely via BGP [RFC7938].
Notes:
The period is missing at the end of the sentence.