RFC 9537, "Redacted Fields in the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Response", March 2024

Errata ID: 8004
Status: Reported
Type: Technical
Publication Format(s) : TEXT
Reported By: James Gould
Date Reported: 2024-06-26

Throughout the document, when it says:

This document describes a Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)
extension for specifying methods of redaction of RDAP responses and
explicitly identifying redacted RDAP response fields, using JSONPath
as the default expression language.

It should say:

This document describes a Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)
extension for specifying methods of redaction of RDAP responses and
explicitly identifying redacted RDAP response fields.

Notes:

The Abstract and the first sentence of the Introduction is "This document describes a Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) extension for specifying methods of redaction of RDAP responses and explicitly identifying redacted RDAP response fields, using JSONPath as the default expression language.". This sentence is combining two aspects into a single sentence ("explicitly identifying redacted RDAP response fields" and "using JSONPath as the default expression language") incorrectly. It is true that the extension is "explicitly identifying redacted RDAP response fields" and it's true that extension is "using JSONPath as the default expression language", but the expression languages are optional and the use of JSONPath as the default expression language is not relevant for the Abstract and first sentence of the Introduction. The recommended change is to remove the ", using JSONPath as the default expression language" from the sentences to correct it, resulting in:

"This document describes a Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) extension for specifying methods of redaction of RDAP responses and explicitly identifying redacted RDAP response fields."

Report New Errata